The Crossville city council reversed
its stance on selling property for use as a shooting sports park and
the controversial project is back moving forward following a special called meeting Tuesday evening.
Discussion on a proposed shooting
sports park first became public 20 months ago and was discussed at
city council meetings as the group trying to build the facility were
seeking property to locate the park on from the city.
Mayor James Mayberry addresses called meeting
That property was a portion of land
purchased over 20 years ago and used for a few years as a city run
landfill. After the landfill closed the land set quietly until this
project cropped up. The project was discussed, received support from
the previous council and occasionally came back for discussion as
funding was committed and new details emerged.
Things began moving at full speed late
last year with work on a contract to sell a portion of the city's
original property to a nonprofit group formed to operate the
facility. A sales contract was approved by council at their February
meeting and a small but vocal group of residents who lived near the
proposed location began to complain about who the proposed park could
effect their homes.
In March, the contract was rescinded by
the council at a special called meeting shortly before the sale was
to close under the original contract and additional meetings were
held along with a shooting demonstration at the property this past
Saturday. Sources say that additional work by new city manager Greg
Wood and changes to the contract by city attorney Will Ridley moved
the project back to council consideration.
Crossville city attorney WIll Ridley
explains contract changes.
One change that was made to the
original deal is that the remaining portion of the property along
Albert Frye Road that will only be used for quiet activities such as
air guns, archery and education programs. This will create a buffer
between the shooting park and the closest property beside the
shooting park.
The city had already planned to retain
an area along Albert Frye Road for possible future development and
possible industrial use. The city also retains the portion of the
property previously used as a landfill and other property along the
southern edge of the original property purchased by the city.
Video of full council meeting
The discussion opened at the special
called meeting Tuesday night and Mayor James Mayberry moved to
approve the new contract prepared by city attorney Will Ridley with
the changes. Mayberry's motion received a second from councilman
Scot Shanks.
Mr. Ridley explained about the changes
to the original agreement that restricted the use of the 13.86 acres
in the Northwest corner of the property bordered on the north by
Albert Frye Rd and on the east by private property that includes a
residential cabin.
Ridley said that the property would
revert to the city if funding is not secured by December 31, 2016 and
that funding must be state of federal money.
Other provisions include that the city
council will have the right to appoint two members of the Crossville
Shooting Park, Inc. board and the city will not charge for any
building or other permits required in the development of the project.
Councilman J. H. Graham said he and
some of the property owners in the area of the park had concerns
about the road into the site and the turn off from Peavine road and
felt the road should be brought up to standards of the Crossville
Regional Planning commission. Graham felt there should be a 50 foot
right of way and a 3 lane mouth on the end of the road.
Councilman J. H. Graham talks about Albert Frye Rd.
Mr. Ridley said the road was a county
road and and he didn't feel the city could force the county to make
such improvements.
In order to hear from shooting park
board representative James Wattenbarger the council had to approve a
motion to waive the rules against public comment as council member
Danny Wyatt had a question for him. The discussion included noise
abatement by putting rubber mulch into the walls separating the
shooting stations and while that was more expensive, it would help
with noise. When asked about the road, Wattenbarger said the road to
the Carroll Co. park was smaller and longer then Albert Frye.
Also discussed was night shooting and
Wattenbarger said generally shooting ranges operate to dusk and that
time varies with the calendar. He pointed out in summer that the
time of dusk was later. The facility will not be set up for night
shooting either.
Property owner Harold Stryker suggested
making the entrance to the range come off of Chestnut Hill Road
saying it was a better road and could handle more traffic but no
action was taken on that suggestion.
The vote on the motion to approve the
new contract was unanimous with a comment from Mr. Graham saying that
he was strongly opposed to approving a contract without road
improvements in it but added, I am for the shooting range and I vote
aye.”
No comments:
Post a Comment