An investigation has been started into
allegations that interim city manager Steve Hill had items removed
from his own personnel file going back to his time as the director of
parks and recreation. City attorney Will Ridley has advised Mr. Hill
to return those items to the file.
Interim city manager Steve Hill
On August 30, Mr. Hill reportedly
ordered human resources administrator Leah Crockett to remove the
documents. He advised Crockett that the documents should be removed
based on the city personnel policy that states written records of
verbal reprimands should be removed after 1 year. Written
reprimands under the policy stay in the file up to 5 years.
We spoke with previous city manager
David Rutherford and he stated that he had two meetings with Mr. Hill
over investigations into questions about tools and items purchased.
Rutherford said he considered the first meeting a verbal reprimand
but the second one he considered a written reprimand.
Previous city manager David Rutherford
Before the investigation into questions
concerning a couple of hand tools and the reported purchase of a
lawnmower blade for a cub cadet tractor, a kind that the city did not
own could be completed, Mr. Hill put in his retirement effectively
ending the investigation according to Rutherford.
We requested a copy of Mr. Hill's
complete employee file September 13 and received a copy on September
15. The copy we received did not contain any reprimands in the file.
There is a copy of a speed camera ticket from Oak Ridge dated 2012
that could be related to improper use of a city vehicle.
Because the documents were only removed
two weeks ago, questions have just started to be asked about the
legality of such action and the public records custodian, city clerk
Sally Oglesby brought the matter to the attention of city attorney
Will Ridley. Ridley reviewed the state law on records and contacted
Mr. Hill to replace the documents.
Crossville city attorney Will Ridely
At that point Mr. Hill brought up the
issue of the difference between oral and written reprimands because a
memo outlining an oral reprimand only stays in the file a year while
a more serious written reprimand stays in the file up to 5 years. It
may be necessary for the city to formally contact previous city
managers David Rutherford and Bruce Wyatt to determine which kind of
reprimands were in the file.
In mid April Councilman Pete Souza had
reportedly been contacted and reviewed Mr. Hill's employee file and
found several documents there that he had copies made of and copies
were given to Mr. Hill and the other members of the council. Souza
said that his discovery of the documents made Mr. Hill upset at the
time.
Mr. Souza provided the following
narrative:
“When Mr. Hill was appointed as
interim city manager I received calls stating that he had been and
was investigated for wrongful theft of municipal property. I am
requesting that this investigation be revisited and Mr. Hill be
charged or exonerated. I originally received calls from Parks
department employees (not Ms. French). I also received inquiries
from the press. My first measure was made to Police Chief Shoap and
asked him if an internal investigation was ever conducted into the
Parks department. Chief Shoap checked and told me his department had
not done an investigation.
I pulled Mr. Hills personnel file and
read where Mr. Rutherford had admonished him for excessive use of his
vehicle (the second admonishment by a city manager) and not having
his house in order. I saw to it that the rest of the council got
copies of the admonishments.
I called Mr. Rutherford who informed me
a councilman had complained to him that he ahd reports of wrongdoing and asked him to look into it. He found a problem with accounting
for tools and had ordered inventories of his equipment. He had
finance hold the inventories. Then during the investigation Mr. Hill
opted for early retirement. Mr. Rutherford put a letter in Hill's
file and moved on.
I checked with finance where during one
inventory items were missing, the next inventory there were account
for, the next inventory they were missing and the next inventory they
were accounted for.
Last week a park's employee told me
details on the incident. He asked how it was that nothing was done
about him and how is it possible that he could come back to replace
Ms. French. He told me what happened was Mr. Hill ordered a chain
saw, blower and lawn mower blades for a cub cadet (the city did not
have a cub cadet). That's when the inventory came about Hill
returned the items and told his employee to write a justification for
the chain saw and blower. He asked why since they already had a
chain saw and blower. Mr. Hill strongly admonished them to just do
what they were told.
I asked Mr. Hill about this and he
threw a temper tantrum. He stated he did not have anything in his
file and he would sue anyone who said anything. A reasonable person would believe that this investigation should be reopened and a
determination made to either exonerate Mr. Hill or take appropriate
action.”
Councilman Pete Souza
Mr. Souza also pointed out that Mr.
Hill sets the example for city employees.
No comments:
Post a Comment